WATCH FULL MOVIE ON HULU!!!!
This documentary follows two ballet students from the slums of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Their abilities are simply amazing. The talent they have is outrageous as are the odds they face due to their financial and social situations. The amount of maturity these teenagers face is 'streets ahead' (to coin a phrase from Community) from their peers. They are dedicated to their craft. As anyone even slightly familiar with the professional dance community would know, there are strict standards for dancers body weight and this was evident with the female. Of course she was completely fit by most standards but in the dance world, she was considered 'overweight'. To see that being expressed was heartbreaking as you realize that it must weigh down on this girl so heavily. Her body is perfect by anyone's standards, but to be a young black female dancing in Brazil signifies extra curves and exclusion from the Brazilian ballet standards. This film was inspiring to see despite the sad realities. It was one of those films that makes you re-evaluate where you are in your own life and what you have managed to accomplish so far. I actually teared up watching the trailer just now. It's so amazing what a person can accomplish in a lifetime. WATCH FULL MOVIE ON HULU!!!!
One of the films from my box set. There was a weird bit between the two black characters as a side story. It was a bit of a class issue as well, as one of the black servants was more 'high class' than the other. That was quite the interesting look into that situation. As far as the rest of the story, it was okay. Pretty standard story of boy needing to win back the girl from a con man and save his town ;) I liked how bold the gal was in the end. The scene at the end that took place at night was underdeveloped on my video and is only slightly better on the link on youtube. WATCH THE FULL MOVIE ON YOUTUBE!
This was a patriotic film done partially by character voiceover. The message was to do your civic duty and enlist AND pay attention to the issues in your community. There was quite the suspension of disbelief at the end when the soldiers got rowdy and out of line. Seems like that wouldn't have been allowed in the slightest!
Like many of the films from this box set, you can watch the films on youtube. (I think it it more or less legal because of the rights to the films having expired or something or other, legal jargon, mumble mumble.
I had been very excited when I first saw the trailer because I was enchanted by the idea of a black and white silent film homage. I mean, hi, I was a film studies major in college, and I'm writing a movie blog, so yeah, film history is incredibly interesting to me. When I saw how it swept away the Golden Globes, it was time to finally getting around to see it. I don't know if it was my familiarity with black and white and silent films that 'jaded' me or if I just took it all for granted, but I wasn't completely blown away. I mean, I really liked the movie and it was an interesting experience to be in a theater devoid of the usual dialogue that can be distracting. I would most definitely suggest this movie to anyone who wants to experience that feeling. I would also just suggest it for the fact that it is pretty damn close to the feeling of the movies of that era. The time period detail was beautiful and the story line was nice, but it was hard to relate to the characters due to their privileged status. It was harder to feel sorry for them, in a way. Sometimes glamour makes it hard to sympathize with other humans, hence why celebrities often get thrown to the wolves when we dissect their private lives. All in all, a nice film and beautiful piece of art. Charming.
For anyone who likes NPH or Firefly, this is a fun watch. The bad guy is the good guy and the good guy is not so good. It was a fun twist on a genre and the musical part of it wasn't terrible. ;) It was pretty short, all said and done. I was expecting a full length film, but it all came to be about 45 minutes, which left me wanting more. But it told the story it set out to tell. It was clever and I enjoyed it.
I enjoyed this film about loudmouth family with the inability to communicate only because I wasn't involved with the weirdness and it eventually ended. The shouting and the yelling was uncomfortable but a reminder that some families are just messed up. Fortunately, because of a series of events, their lives got much improved. I liked this film and recommend it. :)
Words
to describe this film: disconcerting, audibly confusing, gut-kicking.
The shots used in this film accurately conveyed to the audience the
feelings we were supposed to feel. Tight shots on the incredibly shy
Jorge were disconcerting. I really wanted to have a clear look at his
face, but we were rarely granted access. It was audibly confusing only
because of the HEAVY accents of the characters. I usually watch ALL of
my films and shows with subtitles, regardless of the language, and I'm
usually pretty good with understanding accents, but there were so many
and it was hard to understand. It was gut-kicking because you REALLY
felt for Jorge and wanted him to just speak up! And his home situation
was scary as well. You knew something wasn't right and just wanted him
to get to a better spot. OH! And Mandy Patinkin's character had dialogue about a place called Coral Castle in Florida and I've been there!!! It was super cool to hear a reference to it (although slightly inaccurate) in a film!
Everything Must Go (2010)
Directed by: Dan Rush
Writers: Dan Rush,
Raymond Carver
This film was a more serious role for Will Ferrell and so it's harder to watch him play a more developed character. That's the risk for comedy actors and the ability to bridge over into more serious roles. It was okay for a watch. It had enough humor amidst the heavy feel to keep Will Ferrell fans entertained. I really liked and felt for the character of Kenny, the young boy.
I love drag movies and watching a movie where a woman goes in drag as a man is rare to find. It was definitely a kid friendly movie (unless you have zero tolerance for gay innuendos). I did want to turn it off at one point (was watching it on Hulu) but stuck through it. Missi Pyle did a pretty good job playing the double characters. You know her. You've definitely seen her around and she was part of the Golden Globe winning cast for
The Artist. The movie was cute and something to watch. Predictable, of course, but what (family) movie isn't?
Okay, I've been to India and I watched the 2010 TV show of the same name prior to learning about this movie. The movie represents India well enough. Makes it more rural than it can be. But watching the movie after watching the television show is a BIG letdown. The TV show was more upbeat, the characters were more lovable and entertaining. The movie didn't meet my expectations built up by the movie as far as mood went. BUT it did well to show the reality of culture shock. The actors in the movie honestly weren't 'Hollywood' enough in the looks department. I know we all say 'Why aren't actors more normal looking?' but this movie exemplifies how hard it is to be enthralled with 'normal' looking people. If you can handle a reflective movie, try this one out.
So, my goal for the year is to watch one movie a week from this box set purchased over a year and a half ago.
The premise of this movie is that men take their wives for granted. We watch as three men discover a letter from their friend Max, telling the husband that Max and his wife had an affair. We get to see flashbacks and wonder for ourselves if it's true or not. Cute premise and nice message ;)
I think I held off on this movie for the longest time thinking it was similar to Thank You for Smoking (2005), misled by the name Phillip Morris, thinking it to be a reference to Philip Morris, the cigarette company. Oh, but how wrong I was. A trailer before one of my other movies cleared that right up for me.
I really liked this movie. It was conman love story with a twist and apparently
based on a true story. If you aren't homophobic, you'll enjoy it.Watching the trailer makes me want to watch it again. That's a pretty good sign.
This movie is the opposite to the other old movie in this entry. The first one defends women, this one makes them out to be nothing but money grubbers. And the only 'good' woman in the movie is one that is 'just like a man'. But still, good for a watch. History, baby!
WATCH FULL MOVIE HERE!!
____________________________
So, that about covers it. 6 movies in 2 weeks. I really do hope you take the time to watch the two old movies shown here. They are shorter in length and witty. And although not super-memorable, still time capsules that can help you appreciate how far we've come, in many ways. PEACE.
I thought I had a lot more movies to cover this time but I forgot my last entry. Still... on Dec 25th and 26th, I watched 3 movies each day. It's like I was back in school! ;) Movies that I rewatched: Easy A (2010), Zindagi Na Milegi Dobara (2011) and National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation (1989)
We all have heard of this movie for the fact that Heath Ledger died during filming. I was interested in seeing this movie and how they handled it.The trivia page on IMDB states:
After the death of Heath Ledger, production was shut down for a few months. Then it was re-started when Johnny Depp, Jude Law and Colin Farrell
agreed to complete Ledger's role. The film's fantasy premise, and some
clever rewrites, let the actors play a man whose appearance changes as
he travels between imaginary worlds.
According to Terry Gilliam, the last line Heath Ledger spoke for filming on the set was "Don't shoot the messenger." When Johnny Depp
filmed his role after Ledger's death, Depp asked Gilliam if he could
try a new ad-lib: "Don't shoot the messenger", unaware that Ledger had
improvised an identical line. Gilliam was astounded, remarking, "Heath
is still out there. Johnny's channeling Heath somehow. I mean, Shirley MacLaine would love all this."
As far as my thoughts on the movie? I liked it well enough. (I had to pause part way through because it was X-mas and the family arrived.) It was a fantasy movie based enough in reality that one was able to follow along. And it was moralistic yet interesting. I do recommend this movie. I had been lukewarm going into... knowing that I 'should' watch it, but I did rather enjoy the outcome.
A movie in which Edward Norton played twins, it was okay for a movie to watch if you have downtime. It was pretty formulaic and predictable however. I feel bad for not being more involved in the movie, because there were some big names in the movie: Susan Sarandon, Richard Dreyfuss. Keri Russell played the love interest. (Danny DeVito's daughter: Lucy DeVito and TV's Modern Family dad Ty Burrell)
The movie was a little hokey and predictable. It wasn't terrible and had it's funny moments. This one I leave up to you.
I liked this one. It was funny yet dark. Not so much a black comedy as a sad reality. Even though I forgot high school and moved on, it's interesting to see someone who so clearly hadn't. I can relate to the character a bit, and I wouldn't be surprised if most of us could. It shows us our deep, scary parts that we try to suppress.
It's pretty rare for a movie to get you to empathize with a Neo-Nazi but this movie does. It's dark, yet humorous and borders on the spiritual. It was slightly absurdist but I enjoyed the ride.
I'll be honest. I've never read the books nor even seen the cartoon. I was also hesitant to watch this movie, probably for those reasons, but again, felt I 'should' watch the movie. So my mom and I sat down and watched it.
While I'm glad it had a female as the hero, and I'm okay with some absurdity, it was a little hard to follow along and we even had subtitles, so that's saying something. If you're a fan of the books or Tim Burton (I am), you've probably seen it already, so I'm not trying to convince anyone. Would I watch it again? Hmmm.
I sure have a lot of 'spam' comments getting to my inbox. Does anyone real read this? :(
It's been nearly a month and I've only watched 6 movies. I have been pretty busy though with 3 jobs, volunteering and all my artistic endeavors so you'll have to excuse me. Well you don't have to but it would be nice if you did.
So this was my Bollywood flick of the batch. I've got to tell you, Bollywood is constantly pushing the limits. This movie is about two guys who end up being male escorts. Of course, B-wood manages to make it mostly clean. They set limits. And they have to because one of them is engaged. Of course, the only reason they do it is because it's 2009 and the economy is really bad and they can't find regular jobs. HA! Of course it's a little far-fetched but that's typical of this industry. The music was good and it was fun to see the different themes the guys used to make women happy. And of course see them shirtless. Rawr.
This short film was campy and fun and left me wanting a bit more (in a good way). It was done as if it was an episode for a TV show. It was a farcical look at the stereotypes that Americans have of people from the Middle East. I thought it was clever and well-done. (After searching for the video below, it looks like it was released as a series of webisodes.)
This movie was very much a love affair with cooking. And caring for one's family as well. It has a strong cast and was a pretty laid-back movie. It was mostly predictable but had a few parts that threw me for a loop (as did the ages the sisters were supposed to be). If you love food and are often frustrated by your family or if you have an affinity for the Mexican-American culture, you'll enjoy this movie as I did. Oh and the music is pretty good too. :)
I first heard about the book that has wonderful illustrations done by the author. I then heard that this movie was amazing and had to see it for myself. It was. SPOILER ALERT: This movie was a love note to the invention of cinema. It made me cry to see old movies back on the screen where they deserved to be. Originally when I went to see this movie, I thought it was going to be all animation, but it was mostly live action. The cast was fantastic of course. Ben Kingsley, Sacha Baron Cohen, Asa Butterfield, Helen McCrory, and Chloë Grace Moretz, who I now recognize from Kick-Ass (2010) which I reviewed here. I am interested to read more in depth about the factual information that was probably altered for story's sake.
After watching the trailer, I am reminded how it bothered me that even though the film took place in Paris, all the characters spoke English with British accents. That and the music in the trailer belies the actual tone of the movie which is a little slower and darker.
I absolutely love the Muppets so there was no doubt that I was going to see this movie. It lived up to the old legacy of the other movies with the humor, the situations and the cameos. It was truly a feel good movie. I've heard that Fox News thinks it promotes a message to children to not trust big corporations. Well, even if it does, I think that's a fine message for children to learn because corporations aren't people. People are people. And Muppets are people too! ;) Now the hardest part will be choosing which of the many trailers to showcase here. Let's just say, the Muppets were VERY good about their marketing campaign!
Payne is a local hero so of course this movie was big in our town. And for good reason. Payne really knows how to tell a story through emotion, character and humor. I'm told the novel is very good to begin with and will have to read that before too long. The presentation of the story was very nice. Of course the people and the scenery were easy on the eyes too. It was quite the tease to watch it in December in the cold Midwest. :( The movie was very well done and did get at your emotions, whether you wanted them to or not. The sense of empathy for the characters was very tangible.
So there you have it folks (and spammers). Real people, please leave me comments about these movies. Have you seen them? What'd you think? Any similar movies you would recommend to me or other reader? Okay, I'm peacing out now!
I really liked this movie! I saw it at the dollar theater with my younger brother who is not an idiot or at least not by these standards. ;) This movie basically takes the simpleton and elevates him to a higher standard to make a point that the rest of us are missing out on the simple things of life. I liked many of the actors in the film so that made it all the more fun. (Paul Rudd, Zooey Deschanel, Adam Scott, Rashida Jones, Steve Coogan) I really like the juxtaposition between the time we spent in 'hippy land' versus 'normal land'.
I will admit that this book series turns back the clock and makes me return to my younger years. Okay, so we're talking 10-15 years only but it's fun to escape the adult world and transport back to being an angst-ridden teen (only because I know I am no longer in that painful stage of life). I'm currently reading the 7th book and I think I have three more to go. This particular movie is based on the first two books and of course it took some liberties and changed up the story a bit but as Director Gurinder Chadha mentioned in the bonus features, it was a challenge to create a movie out of a series of books that were written as a diary of the character, Georgia Nicholson. As a fan of the book series, it was a little scary, yet fun, to see these characters on screen. As any reader knows, there is the fear that the characters/actors on screen will somehow muddle the characters you have in your mind. Interestingly, Gurinder said she was following some of the fan blogs of the book series and was happy to find many readers were happy she was going to direct, rather than an American. I think that's great. Georgia's personality is influenced by being British, and it's important to keep that authentic. Anyway, I think the film is fine on its own, but it's much more fun to know the history on the characters in the novels. I feel the characters in the novels have a bit more history than their on-screen counterparts but it may be just because I know it. It was also fun while watching the behind-the-scenes to see the interactions between the cast members, particularly the younger ones, talking about crushes on set and so forth. VERY much the same high school atmosphere of the books. I thought that was very cute!
And now for something completely different. Wow. I went to see this film showing at the local movie house and I was warned about Divine eating dog poo but I still wasn't quite prepared for this very interesting film. Let me say, this is the second most scarring film I've seen. The first is Salò, or the 120 Days of Sodom (1975) which I briefly reviewed here. Oh and I guess Blue Velvet (1986) is in third. When I think John Waters, I know to expect a bit of camp but this was ... different. I'm very glad I saw it in a theater full of other people who more or less knew what to expect (they must have seen it before). If I would have seen it on my own... I may not have finished it. It's sometimes hard for me to watch films that are just rotten but this one was intentionally so. I remember watching Waters' original Hairspray (1988) and just being pained at how awkward it was with the poor timing as far as editing goes. But after watching this film, it makes a bit more sense. If you are a very brave soul, you might try this movie. But there are all sorts of scenes meant to make a person incredibly uncomfortable. And they succeed. P.S. If you watch the trailer below, I heartily agree with the guy in the cowboy hat at 1:41. ;)
________________________________
Okay, so here is the section of my current post that will be dedicated to the Harold and Kumar movies. I'm glad that my professors in film school had a healthy appreciation for 'low brow' comedies. It makes it feel like I have permission to like movies with fart jokes and such and claim it is scholastic research. As my professors would probably tell you, 'low brow movies' are just as important to our society because they are indicative of a large sector of the population. And if my teachers, both with doctorates, like these movies, hell, I'll admit I do too! I really like Kal Penn, not only because he is 'ridiculously good-looking' but because he is a scholastic as well. I'm intrigued to know more about the class he taught about Asian representation in the cinema, as I spent several years of my undergrad discussing movies (and continue to do so) aaaaand because I have a healthy adoration for Bollywood films. From what I can tell, I find Kal Penn to be not only a versatile actor but an intriguing person as well. Okay, enough gushing about Mr. Modi (oh, sir, if you are reading this, feel free to contact me... I have a 60 page thesis about Minority Directors that I pretend you want to read. haha)
I'd been looking to buy the first two movies for a while but every time I
went to Target, it was one or the other but never both, until I found
them as a double pack on the Target website for a VERY nice price. So
anyway, I bought the set and watched the first one Monday, the second
one Tuesday and then went with my brother and a friend to see the third
in 3D. Twas quite fun.
Okay, I'm going to briefly discuss these movies but not as much as I would were it for a class paper.... I believe I've had some readers chance upon my blog who may have used some of my thoughts for their OWN work. Having no proof... onward I warily go.
This is the one that started it all! Stoners go on an unexpected road trip to get some noms. I don't know how they thought to put Neil Patrick Harris in these movies but it has been tons of fun. Probably because we all love Doogie. This movie sets us up pretty well with an awesome cast of memorable characters and the crazy scenarios in which Harold and Kumar find themselves. It also set the stage for the common theme in all the movies to not put faith in stereotypes of other cultures. The stereotypes were flipped around to show how ridiculous they could be. It's nice to see that done in a set of movies that is supposed to be 'low brow'. Sure, they can be rude and crude but they don't rely on reinforcing stereotypes to get laughs but more so by showing the opposite.
We rejoin H&K, not 4 years later, but basically 4 seconds later where the first movie left off. Insert love story for Kumar and you have a deeper bit of characterization (besides his innate medical abilities). Let me just say, Weedy is the best. Oh and NPH. Both made a return. The storyline remains more or less the same as the two battle the odds to make it out okay in the end. What, did I spoil it for you? I like the look at G Bay. As you can tell, comedy can often be a very subversive genre as it can show make a statement about the conditions in which terrorists or suspected terrorists are held without coming off as political. And of course, the movie yet again plays with ethnic stereotypes and comes out ahead.
This one I will cover a little more because it's new and many of you won't be as familiar with it as the previous H&K movies. This movie was definitely different. More grown up in the fact that there wasn't as much focus on weed but we got to explore more hard core drugs. There was plenty of humor to be found in that as well. The H&K characters were more grown-up and the NPH 'coming out' was most definitely addressed, as well as his death in the previous film, and both were pretty funny. I really liked all the tongue in cheek references to the 3D format itself because it meant they didn't take themselves too seriously and that's important in a comedy. Wafflebot was pretty damn funny too. I just re-watched the trailer (actually that was the first time I'd seen the trailer... I didn't need to see a trailer to know I was gonna see this movie!) and I recalled the claymation part which was awesome and reminded me of the Claymation xmas episode from Community last year. In general, I'm not a big x-mas person and many times holiday movies can be too much for me but this was perfect because it was irreverent but in a fun way. I personally am happy to see this as the cap to the H&K legacy. As a writer myself, I have a hard time envisioning what territory is left to be tackled. I know they set up the characters for having kids but I think if it's not broke, don't fix it. I think it's always important to know when to stop. I feel like the H&K crew has done a fantastic job on all these movies and I'd like it to end on a high note... (pun partially intended).
So, for all three movies, I would like to say... Bravo! These movies are a lot of fun. Likeable reoccurring characters (pretty sure I saw Bobby Lee in all three... KM, he was in the wedding scene as a guest in #2, right? He's not credited but I could have sworn I saw him there), constantly making statements in a non-statement way about politics, stereotypes, familial obligations. And each movie opened on Harold. Wait, I think the third one opened on Kumar? Regardless, I had a great time with these films and was happy to see these talented actors get some screen time when many parts go to more ahem, white bread actors. Best to all of the H&K cast and crew!
Okay, back to our regularly scheduled blogging....
Ah, Bollywood. John Abraham makes my heart go BOOM and RAWR simultaneously... Xavs, you know what I'm talking bout. Me-ow. Anyway, also love Abhishek Bachchan how can you not? So as far as storyline goes, this one is mo def for the guys, more so than the usual B-wood themes. And that's cool. I can appreciate a sezy bike as much as the next gal... esp when Mr. Underwear Model is riding one. Okay, sorry, I'll continue back to my professional assessment of this film. What you have here is the action-packed film that doesn't completely pigeonhole the bad guys as bad. John Abraham's characters is quite idealized in a way as the noble bad guy who was capable of so much more. Not as noble as his good-guy-cop-counterpart, Abhishek, but close. I couldn't help but laugh my butt off when it came to the final sequence. I'm not sure if I'm supposed to be laughing but I can't help it. The thing about Bollywood is that it is equal parts escapism as it is absurd. You relinquish a hold on reality in order to just let the movies capture your emotions. Somehow I find it easy to appreciate when it comes from Bollywood than when it's from the Hollywood machine. But that may be because I allow more dalliances from the norms from other cultures. That and B-wood is just too fun to take too seriously. Oh and btw, it took forEVEr to find the following trailer. There were tons more for Dhoom 2 and 3 though ;)
Written by: Mark Weisbrot,
Tariq Ali
So, I picked this movie up from the library and was very excited to watch a movie about the political arena of South America, especially because I studied in Chile for a semester 6 years ago. (And I'll be going back for a tour within 6 months, if all goes well! Hey KM, if you're still reading this...wanna visit my friends, Easter Island and Macchu Picchu with me? None of my friends have enough money lol) Anyway.... although Oliver Stone deserves respect and I very much agree with his distaste of the U.S. media, I couldn't help but be put off by his methods. He basically went around and talked to many of the political leaders and lumped them altogether as following out the 200+ year old Bolivarian idea of Revolution to reclaim the countries from imperialism. But it's not as simple as that. If you go talk to politicians, of course they will show you a good face and make you think they are wonderful people. At the end of the film, Stone walks down the street in one of the countries, basically monologuing about how great it is what these leaders are doing. To me that screams 'wealthy white man making oversimplified conclusions based on biased information'. It doesn't sit well with me. I do appreciate his call to attention the improper handling of Latin America by the U.S. media but when Oliver Stone tells the audience that Hugo Chávez, president of Venezuela, has teamed up with North Korea and Iran for nukes and that he has 'less human rights violations than Colombia' .... well, that doesn't sit well with me to promote Chávez as a well-intentioned ruler. I have a general distrust of politicians and national governments because I know they are run by individuals who are not as saintly as they like to portray. I think the politics of the countries of Latin America are much more complex than Stone indicated. He did well to show the hypocrisy of the U.S. Government when it comes to defining a democracy and helping support coup d'etat's in other countries. Stone only touched on the U.S. involvement in a coup d'etat in Venezuela but this has happened in 1973 in Chile in a VERY bloody manner, thanks to U.S. involvement. And Lord knows, it's happened in many other countries. The U.S. only supports democracies that do what the U.S. wants them to do. Okay, so this isn't a political blog and I'm not the most educated when it comes to politics either, especially not the politics of other countries. But I don't think Oliver Stone presented a complete look at the societal arena when it comes to politics. I agree with Stone that the U.S. media is not accurate and that these South American countries and their governments deserve more respect BUT I can't condone his acceptance and promotion across-the-board of these leaders without further delving into the not-so-pretty aspects of their governance. BUT it's a start to getting people to open their eyes to the people of South America.
Okay, this is the last movie. It's now taken me over 3.5 hours to write this blog entry. This is what I go through for you ;) Appreciate me! Or don't. :P Anyway, I can now say I've seen this film. I really do like Peter Sellers so this was a nice movie to watch. I don't want to say 'fun', because it wasn't so much fun as it was slightly absurd. But not the same kind of absurd as I mentioned above for Bollywood movies. This movie, like the first I discussed (Our Idiot Brother), deals with a simpleton but one that gets mistaken for a genius. Of course, it's white people who find him to be a genius but black people can see that he's "not right" (one was a woman who raised him and another was a group of kids who talked to him on the street). There was a message spray painted on the wall as well that indicated this theme to me but I don't want to misquote it and couldn't find it. And the DVD is all packed back in the envelope ready to go. So you'll just have to trust me on that. Or if anyone has access to the movie, it's when Chance is walking around D.C. after being dismissed from the house. Anyway, this film was a delicate statement in subtext and let you draw your conclusions without completely hitting you over the head. It's interesting to see the portrayal of mentally disadvantaged man in this manner. It feeds into the cliché that there's something desirable about being a simpleton. Obviously, this film requires some suspension of disbelief. As someone who volunteers with special needs people, I can tell you that most people can decipher these differences. And if you say you'd like to be naïve of the ways of the world, you're not being completely honest. Still, the message of the film was well-presented.
______________________
Okay, 3.5 hours of my life is now in your hands. I hope you have enjoyed the ride. Feel free to comment below if you have any opinions to add or suggestions of films to watch. Peace out!!!
